[RadiusNT Digest]

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Previous message: Dale E. Reed Jr.: "Re: Radius 2.5 Installation"
• Next message: John Rickabaugh: "Re: Fw: ANNOUNCEMENT: RadiusNT 2.5 Releases"

Message 2: RadiusNT 2.5
from "Lamar Townsend" <lamar@shuttle.com>

Message 3: Re: Default NASPort
from Michael Whisenant <mwhisen@airnet.net>

Message 4: Re: PPTP and RadiusNT
from Michael Whisenant <mwhisen@airnet.net>

Message 5: Radius 2.5 Installation
from "Jorge Pocaterra" <junior@enlared.net>

Message 6: SNMP Concurrency control
from "Kurt Schafer" <kahuna@cyberbeach.net>

Message 7: Upgrade 2.2 to 2.5 (Standard not Enterprise)
from George Stossel <stossel@dacor.com>

Message 8: RE: Fw: ANNOUNCEMENT: RadiusNT 2.5 Releases
from eric@valleynetworking.com (Eric Cowperthwaite)

Message 9: Emerald installation
from Glen Harvy <glen@aquarius.com.au>

Message 10: Re: Fw: ANNOUNCEMENT: RadiusNT 2.5 Releases
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>

Message 11: Re: SNMP Concurrency control
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>

Message 12: Re: Upgrade 2.2 to 2.5 (Standard not Enterprise)
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>

Message 13: Re: Radius 2.5 Installation
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>

..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 1 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: AcctSessionTime question
From: "Danny Sinang" <danny@uplink.com.ph>
Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 15:39:42 +0800

>> Yeah, I might be worrying too much, but my users might find it odd if I
>> overcharge them. These few seconds could add up to a substantial amount
of
>> time for which they might get billed extra.
>
>Do you bill by the second or minute?

By the minute. But these little seconds could add to up several minutes.

>> Do you mean I only have to specify an AcctDelayTime in RadiusNT to
subtract
>> 2 or 3 seconds from the AcctSessionTime ?
>>
>> Or is the NAS supposed to return AcctDelayTime ?
>
>The NAS does.

Hmmm.

Dale, if AcctSessionTime isn't supposed to be that accurate ( as you stated
in the last email ), then the user will be deprived of some online time when
I turn on TimeBanking. Is this correct ?

Or does TimeBanking take into consideration the value of AcctDelayTime ?

And given your formula for AcctSessionTime, should I ask the RRAS developers
to use AcctDelayTime in computing for an accurate AcctSessionTime ?

- Danny

..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 2 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: RadiusNT 2.5
From: "Lamar Townsend" <lamar@shuttle.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 05:09:26 -0500

Dale,
It was never installed as a service.. I had been running it in -x15
mode
until yesterday when my business partner decided to log off all of the
machines
and then people started calling complaining that they could not get online
(What
a concept) and I decided the time to set it up as a service was upon me.

Lamar Townsend
Microgear Computers & Microgear.Net
lamar@microgear.net
lamar@shuttle.com

>>
>> I downloaded the latest and greatest Radius 2.5 tonight right after
>> you uploaded it (Kurt and I were having trouble downloading it so he
called
>> you about it) and during the installation everything went smoothe. But,
>> after the install I went to install it as a service since I have been
>> running it in -x15 mode for the past few weeks and it lost ALL of the
>> settings in Radius Administrator after I told it to install service. I
do
>> not know if this is a problem or just one of those things but it just
kinda
>> seemed weird and I figured I would post it to the list. Also, can I run
>> call consolidation now that I am running Emerald 2.1.11 and RadiusNT
2.5?
>
> Did you previously have it installed as a service? It should not have
> let you if so. I believe the only setting that RadiusNT itself sets
> when you install it as a service is mode, but I thought we removed even
> that. Did you possibly do a -remove on 2.2 or 2.5? That might cause
> the problems you are referencing. There is no need to do a -install
> for the service unless you install 2.5 into another directory.

..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 3 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: Default NASPort
From: Michael Whisenant <mwhisen@airnet.net>
Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 13:18:21 -0500

Dale... anyone.... any reason this should not be working.... and can we get
the messages/autoresponder from Sheryl about the new RadiusNT turned OFF!

At 06:07 PM 5/29/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Brian,
>
> We have talked about this before. Here is what I have done. I went into
>Enterprise Manager to the Database-table-calls and in the Default for
>NASPort I typed 9999 and exited out. It asked to save, which I said
>yes.... then I went back and the default shows (9999). I have three
>entries for the last month (3 out of probable 1000 logins) and the rest are
>just running rampant.... I physically see the default is set, yet I wonder
>is there a script that can be run that reports the default value? If so I
>would like to run this and make sure.
>
>At 06:31 PM 5/29/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>Make sure that you have the default value for NASPort in the _calls_ table.
>> I personally set it to (9999) in order for it to have a default. This
>>should clear this up quite nicely from my experience.
>>
>>Brian Lube
>>MPInet
>>
>>At 05:19 PM 5/29/98 -0500, you wrote:
>>> I know the problem is that I need to add a default value for the NASPort.
>>>I have tried and tried to do this in SQL Enterprise Manager, yet every time
>>>I enter the default value, stop and restart radius it never sees that and
>>>then I get bombarded with these request. It is like this feature is a
>>>Borg.... "resistance is futile....".
>>>
>>> This is slowing down the response time and causing the Calls Online table
>>>not to update properly as sometimes the server will be trying to process
>>>these request for several minutes before the other packets will get
>through.
>>>
>>>
>>>radrecv: Request from host cff25105 code=4, id=223, length=109
>>> User-Name = "xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
>>> NAS-Identifier = 207.242.xxx.xxx
>>> Acct-Status-Type = Start
>>> Acct-Session-Id = "xxxxxxxxxxxxx39694"
>>> Acct-Delay-Time = 170280
>>> Acct-Authentic = Local
>>> User-Service = Shell-User
>>> NAS-Port-Type = 5
>>> Login-Service = Telnet
>>> Login-TCP-Port = 1519
>>> Login-Host = 207.120.51.28
>>>
>>> SQL Statement: INSERT INTO Calls
>>(CallDate,UserName,NASIdentifier,AcctStatusT
>>>e,AcctSessionId,AcctDelayTime,UserService,NASPortType) VALUES
>>>(GetDate(),'xxxxxxxxxxxxx','207.242.xxx.xxx',1,'xxxxxxxxxxx',170280,6,5)
>>>
>>>ODBC Error:23000:233:
>>> [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]The column NASPort in
>>table Ca
>>>s may not be null.
>>>
>>>
>>>Resp Time: 170 Auth: 0/0 -> 0 Acct: 1940/3110/42 -> 5092
>>>Michael J. Whisenant
>>>Vice-President, Operations
>>>AIRnet Internet Services, Inc.
>>>ph: (256) 704-4692 fax: (256) 704-2329
>>>
>>
>Michael J. Whisenant
>Vice-President, Operations
>AIRnet Internet Services, Inc.
>ph: (256) 704-4692 fax: (256) 704-2329
>
Michael J. Whisenant
Vice-President, Operations
AIRnet Internet Services, Inc.
ph: (256) 704-4692 fax: (256) 704-2329

..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 4 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: PPTP and RadiusNT
From: Michael Whisenant <mwhisen@airnet.net>
Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 13:18:25 -0500

Anyone?

At 05:29 PM 5/29/98 -0500, you wrote:
> I want to issue a value for certain users upon dialin to set their framed
>protocol to PPTP and their default host to a particular value. ie PPTP at
>the dial-in. This would prevent a user from having to configure a PPTP
>adapter and make many companies I deal with happier. I use the USR TC
>chassis. Does anyone else do this? I am running radiusnt 2.5 and 2.41 I
>do not have these values loaded in as options, so if available, I would
>appreciate detailed information as to how to load them into the SQL
>database and how to implement. Also for reference only does anyone charge
>any additional for offering the PPTP in the chassis?
>Michael J. Whisenant
>Vice-President, Operations
>AIRnet Internet Services, Inc.
>ph: (256) 704-4692 fax: (256) 704-2329
>
Michael J. Whisenant
Vice-President, Operations
AIRnet Internet Services, Inc.
ph: (256) 704-4692 fax: (256) 704-2329

..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 5 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Radius 2.5 Installation
From: "Jorge Pocaterra" <junior@enlared.net>
Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 14:50:48 -0400

Hi Dale

I just Installed RadiusNt 2.5.116 and noticed that the radius administrator
doesn't have ODBC DSN tab and ODBC Options Tab, am i missing something?
and now i'm also geting a error saying RadLogs.data can't be zero length
string...

Thanks

Jorge Pocaterra T.
Junior@enlared.net

..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 6 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: SNMP Concurrency control
From: "Kurt Schafer" <kahuna@cyberbeach.net>
Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 18:20:05 -0400

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_010D_01BD8BF7.91D2B490
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The RadiusNT 2.5 announcement stated that SNMP verification was now =
available to control concurrent logins.

Can you provide a list of NAS's that are supported by this ? In our case =
we have Portmaster 2's and 3's, Ascend MAX 4000's and a few USR TC-16's.

Thanks.

=3D Kurt

------=_NextPart_000_010D_01BD8BF7.91D2B490
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">