Re: AcctSessionTime question

Danny Sinang ( (no email) )
Sat, 30 May 1998 15:39:42 +0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: radiusnt-digest-request@iea-software.com: "[RadiusNT Digest]"
Next message: Lamar Townsend: "RadiusNT 2.5"
Maybe in reply to: Danny Sinang: "AcctSessionTime question"

>> Yeah, I might be worrying too much, but my users might find it odd if I
>> overcharge them. These few seconds could add up to a substantial amount
of
>> time for which they might get billed extra.
>
>Do you bill by the second or minute?

By the minute. But these little seconds could add to up several minutes.

>> Do you mean I only have to specify an AcctDelayTime in RadiusNT to
subtract
>> 2 or 3 seconds from the AcctSessionTime ?
>>
>> Or is the NAS supposed to return AcctDelayTime ?
>
>The NAS does.

Hmmm.

Dale, if AcctSessionTime isn't supposed to be that accurate ( as you stated
in the last email ), then the user will be deprived of some online time when
I turn on TimeBanking. Is this correct ?

Or does TimeBanking take into consideration the value of AcctDelayTime ?

And given your formula for AcctSessionTime, should I ask the RRAS developers
to use AcctDelayTime in computing for an accurate AcctSessionTime ?

- Danny

Previous message: radiusnt-digest-request@iea-software.com: "[RadiusNT Digest]"
Next message: Lamar Townsend: "RadiusNT 2.5"
Maybe in reply to: Danny Sinang: "AcctSessionTime question"