[NTISP Digest]

ntisp-digest-request@iea-software.com
Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:00:52 -0700

Message 1: Re: RRAS and Class C
from "Kevin Ingram" <kingram@cameron.net>

Message 2:
from "Kevin Ingram" <kingram@cameron.net>

Message 3: Re:
from Jeff <nblade@inficad.com>

Message 4: Re:
from "David Payer" <david.payer@ia-omni.com>

Message 5: RE:
from "Richard Lachance" <richard@vircom.com>

Message 6: RE:
from Brian Lube <brian@mpinet.net>

Message 7:
from "Phillip White" <pw@dentech.net>

Message 8: Re:
from Jeff <nblade@inficad.com>

Message 9: (Fwd) question about cisco routers + private addresses
from "Javier Contreras Albesa" <jcontre@server-one.iamnet.com>

Message 10: Re:
from "Paul W. Wilcox" <paulw@surfthe.net.au>

Message 11: Re:
from Patrick Patterson <pj@ctt-inc.com>

Message 12: Fw: Mail list Users: If possible please make your To: field the full E-Mail Address name
from "Rudy Komsic" <rudyk@cyberglobe.net>

Message 13: How do I remove a service manually
from "Danny Sinang" <danny@uplink.com.ph>

..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 1 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: RRAS and Class C
From: "Kevin Ingram" <kingram@cameron.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 07:41:27 -0500

I would put them on a Demand Dial Interface, and then use the static route
function in RRAS admin to add the static route. Make sure you are routing
traffic to that class C to your server from your router/etc. I do this
through my NT server this way.

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul W. Wilcox <paulw@surfthe.net.au>
To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 1998 4:16 AM
Subject: RRAS and Class C

>We have just put an NT based RRAS/NT4.0 solution into one of our regional
>nodes, and I'm having trouble doimg something which should be quite
>fundamental. Can anyone help? Here's the issue;
>
>Customer dials in through RRAS and pulls an IP address of 203.35.164.70
(our
>ethernet address) we need to then route their class c (203.35.193.0)
>through their dial-up connection. I have tried just putting a static route
>in thorugh the commend prompt of
>
>203.35.193.0 mask 255.255.255.0 203.35.164.70
>
>but to no avail. Am I missing something left of center with RRAS? Surely
>there must be a way of routing a class c through a dial-up connection
that's
>initiated by the customer.
>
>Any help would be GREATLY appreciated.
>
>Thanks
>
>Paul
>_______________________________
>
>Paul W. Wilcox
>Director - Sales and Marketing
>Surf The Net Australia
>Email: paulw@surfthe.net.au
>Web: http://www.surfthe.net.au
>Phone: +61 2 9439 9830
>_______________________________
>
>

..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 2 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject:
From: "Kevin Ingram" <kingram@cameron.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 10:05:18 -0500

I need some advice from those who've been there before:

I have a client who wants to host his own domain email using Exchange, he
will connect to the Internet through a local ISP and wants to pull their
mail from our server, we are running EMWAC IMS. They will only connect at
random, so we need to "hold" their mail until they pick it up, and then
their mail server distributes it to their accounts. How is this set up, and
what pitfalls are there to watch out for?

All help and input appreciated.
Thanks,
Kevin

..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 3 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re:
From: Jeff <nblade@inficad.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 08:29:46 +0000

well there are two problems getting what you want done.

1) you need to have some sort of mail system that hold mail. On some
systems this is refered to a Domain POP. Basically it a single mailbox that
recieves all the mail for certian domain. As far as I know EMWAC IMS, does
not do this.

2) you need to have exchange retieve the mail. This is a problem because,
while it can recieve mail on its smtp server, it does not natively have a
way to retrieve mail from a domain pop. There are some third-party add-ons
or workarounds. to do this. something called pullmail and pop2echange come
to mind right way. I am sure that there are more.

I hope that this helps out a bit and is able to steer you in the direction
you need to meet your customer's need.

At 10:05 AM 8/26/98 -0500, you wrote:
>I need some advice from those who've been there before:
>
>I have a client who wants to host his own domain email using Exchange, he
>will connect to the Internet through a local ISP and wants to pull their
>mail from our server, we are running EMWAC IMS. They will only connect at
>random, so we need to "hold" their mail until they pick it up, and then
>their mail server distributes it to their accounts. How is this set up, and
>what pitfalls are there to watch out for?
>
>All help and input appreciated.
>Thanks,
>Kevin
>

..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 4 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re:
From: "David Payer" <david.payer@ia-omni.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 22:34:41 -0500

+AD4-I have a client who wants to host his own domain email using Exchange, he
+AD4-will connect to the Internet through a local ISP and wants to pull their
+AD4-mail from our server, we are running EMWAC IMS. They will only connect at
+AD4-random, so we need to +ACI-hold+ACI- their mail until they pick it up, and then
+AD4-their mail server distributes it to their accounts. How is this set up, and
+AD4-what pitfalls are there to watch out for?
+AD4-
+AD4-All help and input appreciated.
+AD4-Thanks,
+AD4-Kevin

Kevin, We use Vircom's VOPMail but others have a similar capacity to create
an alias for a domain and then map it to a single box. This way all the mail
for that domain comes into the one box. Then they retrieve it via POP3 and
process it again on their end.

David Payer

..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 5 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: RE:
From: "Richard Lachance" <richard@vircom.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 12:31:25 -0400

> -----Original Message-----
> 1) you need to have some sort of mail system that hold mail. On some
> systems this is refered to a Domain POP. Basically it a single
> mailbox that
> recieves all the mail for certian domain. As far as I know EMWAC IMS, does
> not do this.

The IMS version refered to is probably the older "freeware" one. VOPMail,
which is derived from a recent version of IMS Pro, does it well.

Regards,

Richard Lachance.
Vircom, Inc.

..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 6 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: RE:
From: Brian Lube <brian@mpinet.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 14:16:57 -0400

At 12:31 PM 8/26/98 -0400, you wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 1) you need to have some sort of mail system that hold mail. On some
>> systems this is refered to a Domain POP. Basically it a single
>> mailbox that
>> recieves all the mail for certian domain. As far as I know EMWAC IMS, does
>> not do this.
>
>The IMS version refered to is probably the older "freeware" one. VOPMail,
>which is derived from a recent version of IMS Pro, does it well.

We are using NTMail, which also handles this very well. I am told that
NTMail 4 also handles interfacing with Exchange 5.x servers... this isn't
verified though.

Brian Lube
System Administrator
MPInet

..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 7 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject:
From: "Phillip White" <pw@dentech.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 13:21:18 -0500

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0004_01BDD0F4.6895FE60
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

unsubscribe

------=_NextPart_000_0004_01BDD0F4.6895FE60
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">

unsubscribe
------=_NextPart_000_0004_01BDD0F4.6895FE60--..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 8 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re:From: Jeff Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 12:16:39 +0000as an addition to my previous message you could look at http://www.sica.com/freestuf/plugin1.htmit a freeware addition to the IMS, it seems to allows full domainredirection to a single mailbox. which is what you need. to do step 1 of myprior message.At 10:05 AM 8/26/98 -0500, you wrote:>I need some advice from those who've been there before:>>I have a client who wants to host his own domain email using Exchange, he>will connect to the Internet through a local ISP and wants to pull their>mail from our server, we are running EMWAC IMS. They will only connect at>random, so we need to "hold" their mail until they pick it up, and then>their mail server distributes it to their accounts. How is this set up, and>what pitfalls are there to watch out for?>>All help and input appreciated.>Thanks,>Kevin> ..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 9 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: (Fwd) question about cisco routers + private addressesFrom: "Javier Contreras Albesa" Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 17:39:57 -0400Forwarded message:From: Self To: nt-isp@emerald-software.comSubject: question about cisco routers + private addressesReply-to: jcontre@iamnet.comDate: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 17:13:13 -0400Hello I got the following config. 2 routers, connected through frame relay, using eigrp, one of them is connected to the internet (router A). The frame relay has private IP addresses assigned to each side (192.168.2.4/30 network) If router B does a ping outside , it can't receive an answer because it sends the packet with a source route of 192... instead of the IP of the ethernet (208.135...) which is valid. Is there a form to force with IP addres to use as source address? (without using ip unnumbered) The wan does not have any connectivity problems (I can ping each side without problems)Any help is very appretiatedBest regards... ----Javier Contreras AlbesaGerente Tecnico/Technical ManagerInteramerican Net de Venezuela++58-61-970110http://www.iamnet.com..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 10 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re:From: "Paul W. Wilcox" Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 07:39:38 +1000