Message 2: Re: PM2, Cisco and Multi-link PPP
from "Kevin Ingram" <kingram@cameron.net>
Message 3: Re: PM2, Cisco and Multi-link PPP
from "Kevin Ingram" <kingram@cameron.net>
Message 4: Re: PGP mailer
from "Martin" <djmartin@dcdu.com>
Message 5: Re: PM2, Cisco and Multi-link PPP
from Daniel Wood <dgwood@iwvisp.com>
Message 6: Re: ODBC Security
from "Josh Hillman" <admin-maillist@talstar.com>
Message 7: Re: PGP mailer
from Greg Stark <stark@generation.net>
Message 8: Disable 8.3 names on FAT?
from "Paul Sheahan" <pesheah@peoples.com>
Message 9: Re: PM2, Cisco and Multi-link PPP
from "Martin" <djmartin@dcdu.com>
Message 10: Virus Software
from "WINNT" <winnt@hotline.net.au>
Message 11: BayNetworks Help
from "Jim Covington" <jcoving@doitnow.com>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 1 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: RE: ISDN Modems
From: "Waldemar Born" <WallyB@LIP.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 11:55:45 +0200
I think the ELSA ISDN TL V.34 is a good choice. If you want something
cheaper, we in germany mostly use AVM ISDN Cards (for private use).
If you want something serious, get a Bintec Brick XS Office or V!CAS.
-----Original Message-----
From: ntisp-request@iea-software.com
[mailto:ntisp-request@iea-software.com]On Behalf Of Howard Brooks
Sent: Monday, July 27, 1998 9:19 PM
To: ntisp@iea-software.com
Subject: ISDN Modems
Hello ISPer's:
Any recommendations concerning the ISDN Modems that you sell customers? I'm
about to do my first ISDN client.
Howard Brooks, President, IamNet, Inc.
"Your One Stop Internet Support, Solution and Services Shop"
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 2 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: PM2, Cisco and Multi-link PPP
From: "Kevin Ingram" <kingram@cameron.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 07:00:59 -0500
There is actually quite a wealth of information on the Internet about it...
if you do a search for various topics (TCP/IP sunbathing, networking, etc)
and sort through it you will probably find all your answers.
Kevin Ingram
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Waldron <dan@diversified.com.au>
To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
Date: Tuesday, July 28, 1998 12:54 AM
Subject: Re: PM2, Cisco and Multi-link PPP
>Thanks for that Dale! :-) Can anybody recommend any good books on
subnetting
>and routing? I found TCP/IP for Dummies quite useful, but er, limited in
>it's scope!
>
>Rgds
>Dan
>
>-------------------------------------------
>Dan Waldron
>Diversified Data
>dan@diversified.com.au
>http://www.diversified.com.au
>Ph: 0417-659-828 (+61-417-659-828)
>Fx: 02-9832-0951 (+61-2-9832-0951)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dale E. Reed Jr. <daler@iea-software.com>
>To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
>Date: Tuesday, 28 July 1998 11:34
>Subject: Re: PM2, Cisco and Multi-link PPP
>
>
>>Dan Waldron wrote:
>>>
>>> After a lot of drama, we found that apparently the Multilink in NT was
>not
>>> compatible with a PM2. It cost me $220 for M$ to answer this question of
>>> course!
>>
>>Next time just ask Me and I will only charge you $100. :) The PM2
>>used a line load blancing thing (sorta a round robin) where it assumes
>>and interfaces are the same speed and capacity. This is compatable
>>with a a linux hack of the same name. A buffer limitation of the PM2
>>doesn't allow it to do MLPPP on the sync ports. The PM3 however can
>>do MLPPP on an async connection.
>>
>>--
>>Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)
>>_________________________________________________________________
>> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
>> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 3 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: PM2, Cisco and Multi-link PPP
From: "Kevin Ingram" <kingram@cameron.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 07:09:52 -0500
Wow, aren't spell checkers fun! That "sunbathing" in my original message was
originally "subnetting". : )
Kevin Ingram
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Ingram <kingram@cameron.net>
To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
Date: Tuesday, July 28, 1998 7:00 AM
Subject: Re: PM2, Cisco and Multi-link PPP
>There is actually quite a wealth of information on the Internet about it...
>if you do a search for various topics (TCP/IP sunbathing, networking, etc)
>and sort through it you will probably find all your answers.
>
>Kevin Ingram
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dan Waldron <dan@diversified.com.au>
>To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
>Date: Tuesday, July 28, 1998 12:54 AM
>Subject: Re: PM2, Cisco and Multi-link PPP
>
>
>>Thanks for that Dale! :-) Can anybody recommend any good books on
>subnetting
>>and routing? I found TCP/IP for Dummies quite useful, but er, limited in
>>it's scope!
>>
>>Rgds
>>Dan
>>
>>-------------------------------------------
>>Dan Waldron
>>Diversified Data
>>dan@diversified.com.au
>>http://www.diversified.com.au
>>Ph: 0417-659-828 (+61-417-659-828)
>>Fx: 02-9832-0951 (+61-2-9832-0951)
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Dale E. Reed Jr. <daler@iea-software.com>
>>To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
>>Date: Tuesday, 28 July 1998 11:34
>>Subject: Re: PM2, Cisco and Multi-link PPP
>>
>>
>>>Dan Waldron wrote:
>>>>
>>>> After a lot of drama, we found that apparently the Multilink in NT was
>>not
>>>> compatible with a PM2. It cost me $220 for M$ to answer this question
of
>>>> course!
>>>
>>>Next time just ask Me and I will only charge you $100. :) The PM2
>>>used a line load blancing thing (sorta a round robin) where it assumes
>>>and interfaces are the same speed and capacity. This is compatable
>>>with a a linux hack of the same name. A buffer limitation of the PM2
>>>doesn't allow it to do MLPPP on the sync ports. The PM3 however can
>>>do MLPPP on an async connection.
>>>
>>>--
>>>Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)
>>>_________________________________________________________________
>>> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
>>> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
>>
>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 4 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: PGP mailer
From: "Martin" <djmartin@dcdu.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 09:04:17 -0400
Yes it's called BSDI!
www.bsdi.com
Sorry I am just sick of NT not having the versatility of unix.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 7/27/98, at 10:48 PM, Ethan wrote:
>Does anyone know if there is a software package out there that will take
>data from an SSL form, get appropriate public key and send an e-mail
>message (with the encrypted data) to the customer. I have seen many
>packages for unix systems, but none for NT. Any help would be appreciated.=
>
>
>
>
>******************************************************
>Ethan Meiselman "ethan@fdt.net"
>NT Network Administrator
>Florida Digital Turnpike
>Public PGP Key http://gnv.fdt.net/~ethan/keys/pgp.txt
>******************************************************
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 5 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: PM2, Cisco and Multi-link PPP
From: Daniel Wood <dgwood@iwvisp.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 07:06:09 -0800
>Thanks for that Dale! :-) Can anybody recommend any good books on subnetting
>and routing? I found TCP/IP for Dummies quite useful, but er, limited in
>it's scope!
I liked Cisco TCP/IP Routing by Chris Lewis published by McGraw-Hill
Dan
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 6 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: ODBC Security
From: "Josh Hillman" <admin-maillist@talstar.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 10:09:14 -0400
> From: Mark Tran <mpt@pop.gdex.net>
> We just have some new NT box up running IIS4 and just have one question.
As far as I know, when you set up a system DSN anyone can access to it to
modify the database. This can be a serious problem when hosting multiple
sites. Is there anyway to secure the DSN so that only certain user have
access to it.
If your datbases are Access (.mdb or whatever they are), setting NTFS
permissions on them I think will do the trick. If you're using MSSQL
Server, you can assign a plethora of permissions within SQL for read,
write, delete, etc. permissions on a complete table, or individual column,
etc.
Also, make sure that you check out the following page:
http://www.microsoft.com/security/bulletins/ms98-003.htm
Josh Hillman
hillman@talstar.com
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 7 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: PGP mailer
From: Greg Stark <stark@generation.net>
Date: 28 Jul 1998 13:38:31 -0400
"Martin" <djmartin@dcdu.com> writes:
>
> >Does anyone know if there is a software package out there that will take
> >data from an SSL form, get appropriate public key and send an e-mail
> >message (with the encrypted data) to the customer. I have seen many
> >packages for unix systems, but none for NT. Any help would be appreciated.
I would be interested too if anyone has a COM object out there.
Otherwise I would suggest you write a perl ASP or CGI page. Perl can
fork out to external executables and there are modules for handling
SMTP internally, which you need because there's no standard equivalent
to /usr/lib/sendmail on NT.
There's no particular reason to write it as an ASP instead of a CGI.
People will undoubtedly claim there's a performance advantage, but
that's completely irrelevant if you're doing something relatively slow
like signing or encrypting a message. (Even on NT where fork is
excruciatingly slow: the real reasons threads are so popular on NT.)
greg
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 8 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Disable 8.3 names on FAT?
From: "Paul Sheahan" <pesheah@peoples.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 18:01:34 -0400
NT has a registry option called "NTFSDisable8dot3NameCreation" which you can
set to disable 8.3 file names. This results in ONLY a LONG filename being
created for every new file on the system, reducing overhead.
When you create long filenames on a FAT partition under NT, the 8.3 short
filename is also created (you can view it with "dir/x").
Does anyone know how to turn 8.3 filename creation off on a FAT partition?
Changing the above registry setting doesn't seem to effect this option on
FAT partitions, because I can see a short and long filename appear in either
case.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks....
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 9 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: PM2, Cisco and Multi-link PPP
From: "Martin" <djmartin@dcdu.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 21:30:42 -0400
Get tcp/ip from o'reilly and associates.
IN THE REAL WORLD WE USE O'REILLY!!!!
After you read that get tcp/ip for NT (i'll send you the publisher when I=
find the book at home)
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 7/28/98, at 2:06 AM, Dan Waldron wrote:
>Thanks for that Dale! :-) Can anybody recommend any good books on=
subnetting
>and routing? I found TCP/IP for Dummies quite useful, but er, limited in
>it's scope!
>
>Rgds
>Dan
>
>-------------------------------------------
>Dan Waldron
>Diversified Data
>dan@diversified.com.au
>http://www.diversified.com.au
>Ph: 0417-659-828 (+61-417-659-828)
>Fx: 02-9832-0951 (+61-2-9832-0951)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dale E. Reed Jr. <daler@iea-software.com>
>To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
>Date: Tuesday, 28 July 1998 11:34
>Subject: Re: PM2, Cisco and Multi-link PPP
>
>
>>Dan Waldron wrote:
>>>
>>> After a lot of drama, we found that apparently the Multilink in NT was
>not
>>> compatible with a PM2. It cost me $220 for M$ to answer this question=
of
>>> course!
>>
>>Next time just ask Me and I will only charge you $100. :) The PM2
>>used a line load blancing thing (sorta a round robin) where it assumes
>>and interfaces are the same speed and capacity. This is compatable
>>with a a linux hack of the same name. A buffer limitation of the PM2
>>doesn't allow it to do MLPPP on the sync ports. The PM3 however can
>>do MLPPP on an async connection.
>>
>>--
>>Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)
>>_________________________________________________________________
>> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
>> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 10 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Virus Software
From: "WINNT" <winnt@hotline.net.au>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 11:36:31 +1000
Hello List,
I would like some opinions on what is a good virus scanner.
It MUST be completly compatible with NT4Server and Exchange 5.5 and run on
the server.
I would like it to scan emails (attachments) as they are sent and recieved.
We were using Command (f-prot) but it completly corrupted Exchange.
Malcolm Joosse
Technical Director
Hotline Support Pty. Ltd. " Our Service is your Support "
malcolm@hotline.net.au
www.hotline.net.au
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 11 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: BayNetworks Help
From: "Jim Covington" <jcoving@doitnow.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 21:18:48 -0700
Can anyone help me with a setup problem on a Bay Networks
5399. We cannot get it to accept either dialin or talking to a Radius
server properly.