Kevin Ingram
-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Nowell <jnowell@DIALNET.CO.UK>
To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
Date: Monday, July 13, 1998 4:08 AM
Subject: Re: Oops!!
>Gaby,
>
>I had a similar problem a few weeks ago and this is how I solved it.
>
>1. Removed NIC cards completely from metwork control Applet
>2. Downloaded most recent drivers from Supplier
>3. Added both cards using new driver
>
>And hey presto it all started working.
>
>Alternatively you could try another make of NIC cards or perhaps although a
>little extreme you could use RRAS which is a bit more robust than the basic
>Tcp/ip routing provided by NT 4.
>
>Good Luck
>
>Jon
>
>----------
>> From: Gaby <gaby@inco.com.lb>
>> To: ntisp@iea-software.com
>> Cc: nt-isp@iea-software.com
>> Subject: Oops!!
>> Date: 13 July 1998 10:52
>>
>> >>Help!!!
>> >>
>> >>Guys, I need urgent help. I sent a message before but for some reason
>the
>> >>body was empty.
>> >>Well here goes all over again.
>> >>
>> >>The problem:
>> >>------------
>> >>
>> >>I have two networks 192.168.0.x and 192.168.100.x on two separte
>ethernet
>> >>segments.
>> >>That are only joined by a NT 4.0 Server with two network cards that I
>am
>> >>trying to make act
>> >>like a router.
>> >>
>> >>The server's first network
>> >>card has the following config: 192.168.0.15
>> >> 255.255.255.0
>> >>
>> >>The server's second network
>> >>card has the following config: 192.168.100.15
>> >> 255.255.255.0
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>NOTES!!!
>> >>--------
>> >>
>> >>1. The server can see both networks perfectly.
>> >>2. Stations can see both network cards on the
>> >> server perfectly.
>> >>3. Problem is the stations on one network can not see the stations on
>the
>> >other.
>> >>4. When I perform a ping. I do NOT get destination unreachable,
>however, I do
>> >> recieve a response time out error.
>> >>
>> >>ALSO...
>> >>-------
>> >>1. I have the gateway on the stations on network 192.168.0.x set to
>> >192.168.0.15
>> >> the network card on the server.
>> >>2. I have RIP installed if that effects it. I don't think so though.
>> >>3. I have IP forwarding turned ON.
>> >>
>> >>Below is the routing table printed when I execute ROUTE PRINT on the NT
>box.
>> >>
>> >>Active Routes:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Interface
>Metric
>> >>
>> >> 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.15 192.168.0.15
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 192.168.0.15 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.15 192.168.0.15
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 192.168.100.15 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 192.168.100.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.0.15 192.168.0.15
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15
> 1
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Anyone have any ideas? Please help..... =(
>> >>
>> >>Gab.
>> >