RE: Multi-link card

Dwight G. Jones ( (no email) )
Sat, 9 May 1998 21:26:32 -0700

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0003_01BD7B91.233B38C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

We run 93 lines on RRAS/RAS. It's our lab for NTPayMaster, and it's all
we've ever needed. Runs untouched for months on end with USR-TC, we're old
USR-TBBS Sysops.
Best Regards;

Dwight G. Jones
Imagen Communications Inc.
http://www.imagen.net
Information Architects tm

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Waldron [mailto:dan@diversified.com.au]
Sent: Saturday, May 09, 1998 4:13 PM
To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
Subject: Re: Multi-link card

I run a 24 line system purely with Digi C/X concentrators on a P233 with
128Mb RAM. My CPU utilisation is usually under 5% even whilst teh machien is
running IIS 3 hostign about 15 domains, mail server etc etc as well as our
office file serving needs. It works a charm. Haven't even bothered to get
around to RRAS yet, why bother when everything works OK? I can keep adding
concentrators up to 96 modems per C/X card, and then start adding multiple
cards to 192 modems. I still haven't found a good reason why I need a router
when throwing a similar amount of ca$h at a PC gives me a very scalable and
upgardeable solution.

I think the trick is a good HD controller (I'm using a 2940U2W) and good
multiport cards that take the load off the CPU.

My two cents worth!

Rgds
Dan

-------------------------------------------
Dan Waldron
Diversified Data
dan@diversified.com.au
http://www.diversified.com.au
Ph: 0417-659-828 (+61-417-659-828)
Fx: 02-9832-0951 (+61-2-9832-0951)

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Ingram <kingram@cameron.net>
To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com <ntisp@emerald.iea.com>
Date: Sunday, 10 May 1998 4:09
Subject: Re: Multi-link card

I have had good success using RRAS as a low cost, no frills
solution. The
most I currently run on one NT box is 16 ports, but I have several
small
remote servers set up this way, and I will be testing a 32 port box
in the
near future to see how well it works out. I use the older RadiusNT
(v1.60 I
think) and I pull my accounting records from the Access database in
Radius.
I don't need any of the other features other than authentication and
on/off
accounting so it works fine for me.

Part of the attraction for me is that we are also a PC builder, so
having
spare NT boxes isn't a problem. I have run an 8 port system on as
little as
a P90 with 32M RAM and a 340 IDE HD, hardly an expense at all. The
only
software loaded on that box was NT40SP3, RRAS, RadiusNT and drivers
for the
multiport card. (I used a cyclades Y series ISA with cable). With
the cost
of hardware constantly coming down, its easy to put in a P233 64M
RAM 2G
EIDE HD in a server with a 16 port PCI card and NIC, and it flies.

I don't know about 32 or more ports yet, but I would think that with
enough
motherboard speed and RAM it would work fine.

I will know more in the next 30 days, as I have some servers that
will be up
to 32 ports by then.

Kevin Ingram
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas C Kinnen <tkinnen@usacomputers.net>
To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com <ntisp@emerald.iea.com>
Date: Saturday, May 09, 1998 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: Multi-link card

>>I have a total of 52 lines coming into NT RRAS servers
authenticating from
>>RadiusNT with no problems, if you don't need the extra accounting
and
>>features of devices like PM's. All our multiport cards are
currently
>>Cyclades, we use some ISA and some PCI versions of their Y-series
with
>>standard analog modems.
>
>
>If you don't mind me asking have you been pleased with the features
and
>performance of RAS and what type of system are you running the
lines off
of?
>Most of my "encounters" with RAS have not been the most pleasant if
going
>for any advanced features other then just straight dial in. Plus
the over
>head an NT box vs. an access concentrator box like a PM has lead me
to
>recommend customers away from RAS or Netware connect (On the novell
side)
>for larger network access points. I'd like to get a someone's view
point
>who uses RAS in larger the a dozen lines and is happy with it.
>
>Tom
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>

----------------------------------------------------------
NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com

------=_NextPart_000_0003_01BD7B91.233B38C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">

We run=2093 lines on RRAS/RAS. It's our lab for NTPayMaster, and it's all we've =ever=20needed. Runs untouched for months on end with USR-TC, we're old USR-TBBS =Sysops.

Best Regards;

Dwight G. Jones
Imagen =Communications=20Inc.
http://www.imagen.net
Information Architects=20tm

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Waldron=20 [mailto:dan@diversified.com.au]
Sent: Saturday, May 09, =1998 4:13=20 PM
To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
Subject: Re: =Multi-link=20 card

I run a 24 line system purely =with Digi C/X=20 concentrators on a P233 with 128Mb RAM. My CPU utilisation is =usually under=20 5% even whilst teh machien is running IIS 3 hostign about 15 =domains, mail=20 server etc etc as well as our office file serving needs. It works a =charm.=20 Haven't even bothered to get around to RRAS yet, why bother when =everything=20 works OK? I can keep adding concentrators up to 96 modems per C/X =card, and=20 then start adding multiple cards to 192 modems. I still haven't =found a good=20 reason why I need a router when throwing a similar amount of ca$h at =a PC=20 gives me a very scalable and upgardeable solution.
 
I think the trick is a good HD controller (I'm =using a=20 2940U2W) and good multiport cards that take the load off the=20 CPU.
 
My two cents worth!
 
Rgds
Dan
 

-------------------------------------------
Dan=20 Waldron
Diversified Data
dan@diversified.com.au
http://www.diversified.com.au<=BR>Ph:=20 0417-659-828 (+61-417-659-828)
Fx: 02-9832-0951=20 (+61-2-9832-0951)
-----Original=20 Message-----
From: Kevin Ingram <kingram@cameron.net>
To:==20 ntisp@emerald.iea.com=20 <ntisp@emerald.iea.com>
Date:=20 Sunday, 10 May 1998 4:09
Subject: Re: Multi-link=20 card

I have had good success using RRAS as a =low=20 cost, no frills solution. The
most I currently run on one NT =box is=20 16 ports, but I have several small
remote servers set up this =way,=20 and I will be testing a 32 port box in the
near future to see =how=20 well it works out. I use the older RadiusNT (v1.60 I
think) =and I=20 pull my accounting records from the Access database in =Radius.
I=20 don't need any of the other features other than authentication =and=20 on/off
accounting so it works fine for me.

Part of the = attraction for me is that we are also a PC builder, so =having
spare=20 NT boxes isn't a problem. I have run an 8 port system on as =little=20 as
a P90 with 32M RAM and a 340 IDE HD, hardly an expense at =all. The=20 only
software loaded on that box was NT40SP3, RRAS, RadiusNT =and=20 drivers for the
multiport card. (I used a cyclades Y series =ISA with=20 cable). With the cost
of hardware constantly coming down, its =easy to=20 put in a P233 64M RAM 2G
EIDE HD in a server with a 16 port =PCI card=20 and NIC, and it flies.

I don't know about 32 or more =ports yet,=20 but I would think that with enough
motherboard speed and RAM =it would=20 work fine.

I will know more in the next 30 days, as I =have some=20 servers that will be up
to 32 ports by then.

Kevin=20 Ingram
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas C Kinnen =<tkinnen@usacomputers.net>=
To:=20 ntisp@emerald.iea.com <ntisp@emerald.iea.com>
Da=te:=20 Saturday, May 09, 1998 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: Multi-link=20 card


>>I have a total of 52 lines coming into =NT RRAS=20 servers authenticating from
>>RadiusNT with no =problems, if you=20 don't need the extra accounting and
>>features of =devices like=20 PM's. All our multiport cards are currently
>>Cyclades, =we use=20 some ISA and some PCI versions of their Y-series=20 with
>>standard analog =modems.
>
>
>If you=20 don't mind me asking have you been pleased with the features=20 and
>performance of RAS and what type of system are you =running=20 the lines off
of?
>Most of my "encounters" =with RAS=20 have not been the most pleasant if going
>for any advanced = features other then just straight dial in.  Plus the=20 over
>head an NT box vs. an access concentrator box like a =PM has=20 lead me to
>recommend customers away from RAS or Netware =connect=20 (On the novell side)
>for larger network access =points.  I'd=20 like to get a someone's view point
>who uses RAS in larger =the a=20 dozen lines and is happy with=20 =it.
>
>Tom
>
>
>
>
>
>=20 =----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP = Mailing=20 =List           &nb=sp; =20 listserver@emerald.iea.com=
>


-----------------------------------------------------=-----
NTISP=20 Mailing=20 =List           &nb=sp; =20 listserver@emerald.iea.com=
------=_NextPart_000_0003_01BD7B91.233B38C0--