Re: RadiusNT 1.16.49 ?

Jeff Woods ( )
Thu, 12 Mar 1998 14:13:03 -0500

Fine -- DON'T CALL DALE about it.... And don't say he didn't warn you.

I won't support it.

Dale won't support it.

It wasn't me, and besides, I was someplace else and can prove it.

At 08:59 AM 3/12/98 -0800, you wrote:
>I'll be happy to help support it, as well as beg to differ!
>At 08:48 AM 3/12/98 -0800, you wrote:
>>Jeff Woods wrote:
>>> At 07:15 PM 3/11/98 -0600, you wrote:
>>> >We have been trying to get RadiusNT 1.16.60 running in ODBC mode (MS
>>> >Access97) with concurrency control but keep getting bit by the Dr. Watson
>>> >error.......I have been digging through the RadiusNT mail archives and it
>>> >seems that concurrency control just won't work with this version due to a
>>> >problem with the manual calls update option........It was recommended by
>>> >some of the members on the list to go back to the 1.16.49 version of
>>> >RadiusNT to get this to work.
>>> I have a copy, but will only give it out if Dale says I can. Dale?
>>Its freely distributable. I can't tell you not to. I just don't
>>want to field support calls from it. 1.x has many fundamental flaws
>>that make it non-RFC compliant. Thats why we won't support it.
>>Dale E. Reed Jr. (
>> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
>> Internet Solutions for Today |
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> RadiusNT Mailing List
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> RadiusNT Mailing List