ftp://ftp.delta.com/pub/radnt_49.zip
I won't support it.
Dale won't support it.
It wasn't me, and besides, I was someplace else and can prove it.
At 08:59 AM 3/12/98 -0800, you wrote:
>I'll be happy to help support it, as well as beg to differ!
>
>At 08:48 AM 3/12/98 -0800, you wrote:
>>Jeff Woods wrote:
>>>
>>> At 07:15 PM 3/11/98 -0600, you wrote:
>>>
>>> >We have been trying to get RadiusNT 1.16.60 running in ODBC mode (MS
>>> >Access97) with concurrency control but keep getting bit by the Dr. Watson
>>> >error.......I have been digging through the RadiusNT mail archives and it
>>> >seems that concurrency control just won't work with this version due to a
>>> >problem with the manual calls update option........It was recommended by
>>> >some of the members on the list to go back to the 1.16.49 version of
>>> >RadiusNT to get this to work.
>>>
>>> I have a copy, but will only give it out if Dale says I can. Dale?
>>
>>Its freely distributable. I can't tell you not to. I just don't
>>want to field support calls from it. 1.x has many fundamental flaws
>>that make it non-RFC compliant. Thats why we won't support it.
>>
>>--
>>Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)
>>_________________________________________________________________
>> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
>> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> RadiusNT Mailing List lists@iea-software.com
>>
>>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> RadiusNT Mailing List lists@iea-software.com
>
>