RE: Nt option Pack

Kevin Brown ( )
Wed, 03 Dec 1997 13:39:39 -0600

At 11:24 AM 12/3/97 -0800, you wrote:

Ugliness... pure ugliness... but, if it is to continue... let's get even
more fundamental...

Why does a "server" need a monitor?
Better yet, why does a real server need NT?

The arguments on all sides are lame. The whole "option pack" discussion
isn't worthwhile anyway... let's not continue bludgeoning each other over
such trivial things.

PS: Thanks Dale on the SP3 reload for the ODBC issue.. worked like a charm.

>it's not the fact that it needs the browser for operation..has to deal
with Politics...haven't you read all that nice information about Sun and
MS? :)
>From: Sam R. Akhtar
>Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 1997 11:20 AM
>Subject: Re: Nt option Pack
>>Only the browser, and the browser isn't that bad as far as what it
>same difference, why's a SERVER need a browser?
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> RadiusNT Mailing List
>Attachment Converted: "C:\mystic-share\RE Nt option Pack"
Kevin Brown -- Wide Area Networking
Huber & Associates -- A Premiere IBM Business Partner
phone: 573-634-5000
fax: 573-893-8404