Ugliness... pure ugliness... but, if it is to continue... let's get even
more fundamental...
Why does a "server" need a monitor?
Better yet, why does a real server need NT?
The arguments on all sides are lame. The whole "option pack" discussion
isn't worthwhile anyway... let's not continue bludgeoning each other over
such trivial things.
PS: Thanks Dale on the SP3 reload for the ODBC issue.. worked like a charm.
>it's not the fact that it needs the browser for operation..has to deal
with Politics...haven't you read all that nice information about Sun and
MS? :)
>
>----------
>From: Sam R. Akhtar
>Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 1997 11:20 AM
>To: RadiusNT@iea-software.com
>Subject: Re: Nt option Pack
>
>
>
>>Only the browser, and the browser isn't that bad as far as what it
>does.
>
>same difference, why's a SERVER need a browser?
>
>
>Sam
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> RadiusNT Mailing List lists@iea-software.com
>
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\mystic-share\RE Nt option Pack"
>
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Kevin Brown -- Wide Area Networking
Huber & Associates -- A Premiere IBM Business Partner
<kbrown@primelink.com>
finger: kbrown@mail.primelink.com
website: http://mystic.primelink.com
phone: 573-634-5000
fax: 573-893-8404
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////