At 11:51 AM 1/17/98 -0800, you wrote:
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Your following message has been delivered to the 505 members of
> the list ntisp@emerald.iea.com at 11:45:42 on 17 Jan 1998.
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>Compression is hardly a solution as you can only compress what can be
>compressed. In similar relations, modem compression has very little
>(0.01%) effect on Maximum-compression ZIP files. Why not go with a
>fractional line?
>
>At 08:36 AM 1/17/98 -0600, you wrote:
>>I have two NT servers connected by a 56k circuit, and need to increase the
>>bandwidth. Other than going to a T1 (ISDN not available), it looks like I
>>either must add another 56k line and dual feed them, or use compression
>>DSU's.
>>
>>What experiences have all of you had with dual feed 56k's or compression
>>DSU's on a single line? What would you recommend for the best performance? I
>>am using RRAS at both ends currently, with the DSU piped into a serial port
>>on the NT machine, set to 56k on the port. If I use compression DSU's, will
>>the serial port limit the bandwidth to 56k, nullifying the compression? Is
>>there any kind of a port card available for NT with better bandwidth
>>capability, or will I need to bypass the NT machine altogether and use a
>>router into my ethernet?
>>
>>TIA,
>>Kevin Ingram
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>>
>>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>
>