RE: Microsoft DNS vs others

Mitchell B. Wagers ( (no email) )
Thu, 08 Jan 1998 10:08:43 -0800

Thanks for the "whatever it was", but just because you didn't like it
doesn't even come close to meaning it is crap.

At 06:56 PM 1/8/98 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We used MS DNS and it is crap! Now we use BIND for NT
>from software.com which runs without problems.
>
>Christian
>
>
>At 11:41 AM 1/8/98 -0600, you wrote:
>>MetaInfo's DNS servers are pretty solid, and extremely easy to
>>administer. We've been using them in production for about 4 months
>>without any problems.
>>
>>
>>Mike Topalovich
>>TGI Network Services
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kelly Wright [SMTP:kwright@buz.net]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 1998 11:18 AM
>> To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
>> Subject: Microsoft DNS vs others
>>
>> I know there has been comments on this already but before I move
>>from Microsoft DNS I wanted some info on other choices.=A0 I don't like
>>BIND because I am UNIX illiterate.=A0 Thanks for any help.
>> =A0
>> Kelly Wright ( kelly@buz.net <mailto:kelly@buz.net> )
>> BuzNet Communications=20
>> http://www.buz.net=20
>> 972-644-0440
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>>
>>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>
>