Re: max framed ip problem

iml@interconnect.net
Tue, 10 Feb 1998 22:21:54 -0600

Yes very odd....it has to be a bug between the max and emerald because
the max reports an IP for them. Dale any comments on this?? Is it a
known problem? It is reproduced daily on one of my maxes.

Max shows an IP for the person...Emerald Online tab shows 0.0.0.0

On Tue, 10 Feb 1998 19:45:42 -0500, you wrote:

>I've found IP addresses of 0.0.0.0 very common when the user in question
>uses a script rather than PAP to log in to the MAX.
>
>- Kurt
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: iml@interconnect.net <iml@interconnect.net>
>To: emerald@emerald.iea.com <emerald@emerald.iea.com>
>Date: Tuesday, February 10, 1998 5:02 PM
>Subject: max framed ip problem
>
>
>>Has anyone using Max400x had a problem with Emerald reporting a framed
>>address of 0.0.0.0
>>
>>One of my maxes will report a framed address of 0.0.0.0 in the calls
>>table. However, going into the max you can see the actual IP address
>>that the person has using the 'sh users' command. The Online tab in
>>Emerald will show them as 0.0.0.0 not all of the users just some. I
>>can confirm this with a query in the calls table showing me all the
>>framed addresses that had 0.0.0.0
>>
>>
>>Any ideas or has anyone experienced this? It may be a problem with
>>that version of the max code.
>>
>>Brian
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> Emerald Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>>
>>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: iml@interconnect.net <iml@interconnect.net>
>To: emerald@emerald.iea.com <emerald@emerald.iea.com>
>Date: Tuesday, February 10, 1998 5:02 PM
>Subject: max framed ip problem
>
>
>>Has anyone using Max400x had a problem with Emerald reporting a framed
>>address of 0.0.0.0
>>
>>One of my maxes will report a framed address of 0.0.0.0 in the calls
>>table. However, going into the max you can see the actual IP address
>>that the person has using the 'sh users' command. The Online tab in
>>Emerald will show them as 0.0.0.0 not all of the users just some. I
>>can confirm this with a query in the calls table showing me all the
>>framed addresses that had 0.0.0.0
>>
>>
>>Any ideas or has anyone experienced this? It may be a problem with
>>that version of the max code.
>>
>>Brian
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> Emerald Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>>
>>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Emerald Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com