So I guess that means those other vendors are talking out their
backsides! I tried a couple other serial card products 18months ago
and decided to go with the Digi gear. It seems they all have their own
'special' benchmark reports on why their system is best.
...Petar
----------
> From: Danny Sinang <sinang@skyinet.net>
> To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
> Subject: Re: Feedback on performance, reliablility of Digi PC/Xem
> Date: Monday, June 09, 1997 6:39 AM
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> How about the CPU usage ? Other serial card vendors ( Comtrol, Equinox )
> claim that Digi uses 30 %. Is this true ?
>
> - Danny Sinang
>
> ----------
> > From: Petar Nikolich <petar@escape.net.au>
> > To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
> > Subject: Re: Feedback on performance, reliablility of Digi PC/Xem
> > Date: Monday, June 09, 1997 5:57 AM
> >
> > Absolutely brilliant. Never had a problem. Installed heaps of these
> little
> > suckers. Do the job perfectly. Just make sure you get the lastest drivers
> > and READ the instructions before starting.
> >
> > They aint cheap but they certainly are reliable. I couldn't find anything
> that
> > would sustain 57.6k on 32 ports at the same time/. There may be something
> > else available now but I am not aware of what it may be.
> >
> > Petar
> >
> > ----------
> > > From: Danny Sinang <sinang@skyinet.net>
> > > To: NTISP <ntisp@emerald.iea.com>
> > > Subject: Feedback on performance, reliablility of Digi PC/Xem
> > > Date: Monday, June 09, 1997 5:38 AM
> > >
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > Can anyone please comment on the performance and reliability of the
> Digi
> > > PC/Xem hos adaptor card and the Ports/16em modules ?
> > >
> > > - Danny Sinang
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > > NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com