Re: Post.Office - Emerald 2.2.2

Carmine Inteso ( (no email) )
Wed, 25 Jun 1997 07:03:16 -0400

Peter,

I agree!!:-) Especially about your focus on
"the bigger db the more money." Any chance at
seeing your inhouse maintenance scripts?

Carmine Inteso
Ameri-com Internet Technologies
"Bringing you the World"
www.ameri-com.com

----------
> From: Peter A. Sang <pesa@sang.de>
> To: 'emerald@emerald.iea.com'
> Subject: RE: Post.Office - Emerald 2.2.2
> Date: Wednesday, June 25, 1997 5:34 AM
>
> OK, here are our *requirements*:
>
> 1. We have to keep accounting detail records for 3 months after the
> invoice date. They are not intended to be on the invoice since people do
> query them online from the calls table.
> 2. We use the calls table (at least for now and the near future) for
> additional information with acctstatustype=4. These records MUST NOT be
> deleted at all, we do management/housekeeping with our own scripts.
>
> What I'd like to suggest is a 'trim calls/all tables table' button with
> an underlying *administrator-definable* script where Dale supplies a
> default script. However, for *us* this is not really required since we
> do *our* housekeeping with scheduled maintenance scripts.
> All *we* require is the *absence* of 'automatic' well-meaning/bad-doing
> consolidation scripts that could possibly *destroy* our work.
>
> BTW: database is > 1GB and rapidly growing ....no problem, means more
> money..... :)
>
> Again: just *our* requirements....your comments?
> cu,
> -
> Peter A. Sang
> SANG Computersysteme GmbH * Kruppstr. 82-100 * 45145 Essen * Germany
> T: +49-201-82020-0 * F:-40 * http://sang.net * mailto:pesa@sang.net
> * Microsoft Solution Provider * Intel Systems Integrator *
>
> >----------
> >From: Dale E. Reed Jr.[SMTP:daler@iea.com]
> >Reply To: emerald@emerald.iea.com
> >Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juni 1997 23:56
> >To: emerald@emerald.iea.com
> >Subject: Re: Post.Office - Emerald 2.2.2
> >
> >[...].
> >
> >I would like to hear someone's recommendation on how to handle this
> >situation. I have already volunteered to look into an option of
> >mailing
> >the details of the call to the user (configurable on a per user basis).
> >If we don't move the records out of the calls table, users will be
> >double billed.
> >
> >--
> >Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea.com)
> >_________________________________________________________________
> > IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
> > Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.emerald.iea.com
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Emerald Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
> >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Emerald Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com