RE: Post.Office - Emerald 2.2.2

Tom Bilan ( )
Tue, 24 Jun 1997 16:42:30 -0400

I'm running 3.1 and have been patiently awaiting to switch from PO2
so I can have Emerald create 1500 accounts for me automatically.

Also, on a previous thread, I agree with the person who was upset at
the fact that the consolidation erased the detail records. I have had
users in the past who wanted their dates and times online to verify
my numbers. They generally do it to be a pain in the ass but I can
see their point.


At 10:40 AM 6/23/97 +0000, you wrote:
>Dale, we are now running PO3 and would like a copy of Emerald 2.2.25
>if possible. Thanks.
>> Ok. Robert Boyle and myself got to the bottom of this Post.Office 3.x
>> issue today. It seems that Software.Com mis-documented thier "not much
>> used" Email forms and changed it quite a bit in 3.x. Of the more
>> annoying
>> things is that many of the "Optional" labeled form fields are actually
>> not
>> optional, and that is what is causing the problem. We should have a
>> working
>> version of Emerald 2.2.x that will correctly create the accounts on
>> Post.Office.
>> I am not putting the blame on Software.Com (since we do not send all
>> the form fields which would have prevented the problem anyways) just
>> that because of changes in their E-Mail form behavior, it took us a
>> little longer to finally resolve the Post.Office 3.x problems. I'll try
>> to get Emerald 2.2.25 or so to those who have inquired about it for
>> Post.Office 3.x over the weekend so you can install it next week.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Emerald Mailing List