RE: Metafile DNS

Philip Thomas ( phil@saturnnet.com )
Fri, 21 Mar 1997 07:23:05 -0800

I will admit to one thing though, metainfo's DNS is greatly lacking in
performance as compared to the true UNIX version of BIND.

At 12:15 AM 3/21/97 -0600, you wrote:
>We have been using Metainfo DNS 2.1...it sucks...have to go to the office 4
or 5 nights a week to reboot the DNS server.....have tried all of Metainfo's
email suggestions...nothings worked....We are going to NT BIND or KhanBIND.
>
>Vincent L. McCutcheon
>SysAdmin
>Spideyweb, Inc.
>http://www/spideyweb.net
>"We Connect You"
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Accesspoint Corporation [SMTP:ntmail@apc.net]
>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 1997 8:03 PM
>To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
>Subject: Re: Metafile DNS
>
>I use it, I am assuming Metainfo...Got it for the web utility Sucks don't
>use it. Other that the web interface it works great. For money costs I have
>heard NTBind is free.
>
>
>
>At 11:15 AM 3/20/97 -0600, you wrote:
>>Any one out there using Metafile dns server? I am looking at switching over
>to it from my linux dns server.
>>
>>I have it set up for all of my ip's but I do not quite understand how to
>set up Virtual Domains on this software. I could use some help!
>>James Smith
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>>
>>
>Sean Morrissey
>Accesspoint Corporation
>714.781.2288
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>
>Attachment Converted: C:\Internet\tempemail\RE Metafile DNS
>