>We just upgraded our NT Server 3.51 SP5 machine to 128 Megs but NT insists
>that there is only 65 Megs. This is running on an IBM Aptiva which
>correctly reports 128M during the POST and if I use mem from the command
>prompt it also returns the correct info. Any thoughts?
I had this problem when I got from 16M to 32M... When I look at the BIOS
setup, there was an option called "Memory hole at 16M" enabled, which made
my system detect only the first 16M... When I disabled it, the system
recognized the full 32M... Try to look at your BIOS...