Re: Billing question

Pat Augustine ( ereth@ilnk.com )
Thu, 3 Apr 1997 13:01:28 -0500

But if you uncheck 'Active', they won't be included in the Invoice (and
the charge won't appear, either), which would pretty much defeat the
purpose, wouldn't it?

Pat Augustine
Interlink America
pata@ilnk.com

----------
> From: Peter A. Sang <pesa@sang.de>
> To: 'emerald@emerald.iea.com'
> Subject: AW: Billing question
> Date: Thursday, April 03, 1997 12:20 PM
>
> I'd suggest to add further services to the MA, either with standard or
> 'static' costs according to your needs. Uncheck 'Active' for these
> 'dummy' services.
>
>
> >----------
> >Von: Josh Hillman[SMTP:admin-maillist@talstar.com]
> >Gesendet: Thursday, April 03, 1997 17:38
> >An: emerald@emerald.iea.com
> >Betreff: Billing question
> >
> >Are there any ways for Emerald to tack on an extra charge per billing
cycle
> >for the ability have concurrent logins?
> >For example, a customer (business) wants to have the ability to have
> >his/her employees dialup from work (up to 3 concurrent connections using
> >the same login/password). On the technical end, this works just fine,
but
> >how does the billing get affected? Is there some formula built into the
> >Emerald billing process that takes into account the Login Limit number?
> >Normally, a PPP account is $19.95/month, but if the account is allowed
to
> >login multiple times (say 3 times), then the amount should be $19.95 for
> >the 1, then each of the other 2 should be $19.95 (or some discounted
price)
> >per month.
> >
> >Are there any solutions to this?? Am I going to have to create some
other
> >ServiceType (with no login abilities) just to account for the extra
> >dollars?
> >
> >Thanks for any help,
> >
> >Josh Hillman
> >hillman@talstar.com
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Emerald Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
> >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Emerald Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com