RE: [NTISP] IP delegation...

Somlai Gabor ( "Somlai )
Mon, 06 Dec 1999 10:36:19 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: Bob's Lists: "RE: [NTISP] IP delegation..."
Next message: X-BOX/B.P.: "Re: [NTISP] IP delegation..."

>> The reason that we have the constraint is because of the unusual
>> circumstance with our upstream provider. They control the class
>> B, and have allocated us only two class C blocks as of now, so
>> as you surely know 254.0 subnet is appropriate for our circumstance.
>
>254.0 is a supernet, not a subnet. Furthermore, it is *not* necessarily

If the upstream provider controls a real class B, then 254.0 is a SUBnet! ;-)

Regards

Gabor

For more information about this list (including removal) go to:
http://www.iea-software.com/support/maillists/liststart

Previous message: Bob's Lists: "RE: [NTISP] IP delegation..."
Next message: X-BOX/B.P.: "Re: [NTISP] IP delegation..."