[RadiusNT] Re: RadiusNT Digest
Edsonet ( email@example.com )
Thu, 03 Feb 2000 07:55:47 -0700
I am always amazed at how people take pokes at RadiusNT, when they
obviously don't understand the difference between Radius clients and Radius
servers. RadiusNT is a server written to conform to the Radius standards.
The Radius client is the communications box that is requesting the
authorization, and it is the one that causes most of the problems.
************** REPLY SEPARATER **************
At 12:00 AM 02/03/2000 -0800, you wrote:
>Subject: RE: [RadiusNT] malformed packet handling between RadiusNT 2.5.206
>From: "Bob's Lists" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 00:02:59 +0300
>> > Everything works fine with 2.5.206, but as soon as I change the
>> > executable to 2.5.209 and restart the service, I get the
>> > following (debug=18) eventhough "AllowMalformed=1":
>> Set Malformed to 3. The RFC clearly says password data must be a
>> multiple of 16. You'd be suprised how many people can't read an
>> RFC, that write RADIUS clients.
>I'm not sure what that statement implies about the people who wrote 206,
>since it ignored the problem, but I think I find it amusing considering who
>made the statement. ;-)
>Sorry, couldn't resist. I'll get back in my corner now...
For more information about this list (including removal) go to: