No. It means users are not getting billed. :(
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
> On 2/17/00, at 2:53 PM, Dale E. Reed Jr. wrote:
>
> >PowerNet wrote:
> >>
> >> I upgraded to 2.5.327 yesterday. I also have 322.
> >>
> >> We did our batch this morning and it wanted to invoice 196 services for the day, which we knew was way off for todays billing.
> >> We tried with both 327 and 322 with the same result.
> >> We then loaded 300 which we have been using fine for months, and it invoiced the 21 services that it should have.
> >>
> >> Why did it try to bill 196 services?
> >>
> >> We are baffled and cannot keep using the newer versions if they cause us trouble, but the new features are nice.
> >
> >Its sorta covered here:
> >
> >v2.5.313 - 11/3/99
> >
> >* The batch criteria was checking the maExpireDate rather than the
> > billed thru date to determine customers that needed to be billed
> > for certain autobatch processed.
> >
> >
> >What this means is, that it was possible for Emerald to NOT bill
> >a customer. The numbers in 2.5.327 should be correct.
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Dale E. Reed Jr. Emerald and RadiusNT
> >__________________________________________
> >IEA Software, Inc. www.iea-software.com
> >
> >For more information about this list (including removal) go to:
> >http://www.iea-software.com/support/maillists/liststart
>
> For more information about this list (including removal) go to:
> http://www.iea-software.com/support/maillists/liststart
--Dale E. Reed Jr. Emerald and RadiusNT__________________________________________IEA Software, Inc. www.iea-software.com
For more information about this list (including removal) go to:http://www.iea-software.com/support/maillists/liststart